you're reading...
Leadfoot

The Perfect Cartoon

We are used to cartoons of politicians and their dumb deeds that come regularly on national dailies. They provide a lot of material to many of our uncanny cartoonists. Film personalities rarely get their due even though they do ‘politician-like’ acts. Of course, they will take anything that gives them publicity. However, we do have cartoons of unknown, common people (including the famous, ubiquitous common man by RK Lakshman) who form a rare group of exceptions.

When a cartoon of a real person is drawn, it is given many aberrations to make the appearance funny. For example, the idea of large head on tiny shoulders is a common feature of many cartoons of real people. It is very rare to see a disproportionate cartoon of any fictitious character (may even be a cartoon by itself). It is interesting that cartoons of real people have to be made disproportionate (odd) to make them appear funny. In addition, it may be true that we are trained to recognize people through their facial features and any drastic change in a person’s face is immediately noticed by people around him/her. There is no doubt that a face gives us easier and more accessible parameters to compare than any other part of the human body.

The human brain has more or less defined portions that control different parts of our body. Sensory (touch/feel) and motor (movement) capability of body parts vary a lot and the amount of nerve endings dedicated to an organ is positively correlated to its feel/mobility. Keeping this in mind, let us look back at the large head to body ratio in real people cartoons.

You may have read about /seen the homunculus (=little man) models. They are human models that represent human body parts in equivalent proportions of brain area dedicated to their control. The head is huge and the body is tiny. Most real people cartoons have this feature, don’t they?

Two main things in most real person cartoons that do not follow the homunculus model are
1. The human hands are not given prominence in real people cartoons, where as extremely large hands (fists) dominate the homunculus models.
2. The exaggerated/elongated noses of most cartoons do not represent the real picture. It is true that the nose is an important part of human physical identity. At the same time, the human nose is one of the weakest in the entire animal kingdom in terms of sensory capabilities. Many animals have big olfactory lobes in their brains, which are as big as the rest of their brain put-together.
(Potential areas for cartoon experimentation)

You might remember that in an earlier post I had mentioned how I would like to live in a standard normal society. Perhaps, not this time. The human beauty lies in its subtle asymmetries. They may not be as exaggerated as they are in a real people cartoon. However, they are sufficient to make it appealing. Real people cartoons attract us because they are disproportionate and some times, (if the cartoonist is serious) make people think. Real people attract us because they are a little imperfect. May be, we should try to be our own cartoons or a perfected version of it.

Before I continue any further, many of you might be saying, “Hey, we do not look inside a person’s brain when we see him/her …the face does the job!”

About CanTHeeRava

I am CanTHeeRava (ಶ್ರೀಕಣ್ಠ ದಾನಪ್ಪಯ್ಯ) from Bangalore (ಬೆಂಗಳೂರು), INDIA. Areas of my training and interests include Sciences, Indian Classical (Carnatic) Music, Languages, Poetry (Kannada and English), Test Cricket, and Educational & Political Reform

Discussion

5 thoughts on “The Perfect Cartoon

  1. Dani,

    Wery informatiwe and thotphul. u coud hawe added a picchur of ‘homunculus’ so dhaT da reader vill correlate better….

    And one more thing-
    usually the homunculus picture is always a man with a significantly large genitals; on this i have 2 comments —
    1) The real people cartoon misses it🙂

    2) Why don’t they have ‘homunculus female’ ?

    Posted by vatsayana | July 7, 2009, 09:15
    • @vatsayana
      Yes, your questions are well taken. I think the reasons can be
      1. We do not get to see naked people around us, atleast not in India.
      2. Although it is argued that the male and female brains are different in their “wiring”, they are very much similar in totality. It will be a nice attempt to make a little woman’s model as well.

      Posted by danappiah007 | July 7, 2009, 23:28
  2. what do you think will be size of my nose in my brain? cartoonishly high! 😉 ಹೌದಲ್ವಾ?

    Posted by kabNalEkha | July 7, 2009, 16:37
  3. “ಮೂಗೂ ಅನ್ನೋ ಹೆಸರೇ ತಮಾಷೆಯಾಗಿದೆ, ಆದರೆ, ಡಯಾನ ಅವನ ಹತ್ತಿರ ಇರುವುದಾದರೆ ಅದು ತಮಾಷೆಯಲ್ಲ”

    Posted by The Phantom | July 12, 2009, 17:07

Please have your say

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

Enter your email address to receive notifications of new posts by email

ಹಳೆಯ ಕಡತಗಳು / Archives

Recent Posts

Blog Calendar

July 2009
M T W T F S S
« Jun   Aug »
 12345
6789101112
13141516171819
20212223242526
2728293031  
%d bloggers like this: